View Single Post
Old January 13, 2009, 12:54 PM   #95
Playboypenguin
Junior member
 
Join Date: February 27, 2006
Location: Great Pacific Northwest
Posts: 11,515
Quote:
I yield, PBP. You're right. I can't "quite" read it, but I think I see " + P " at the end of the caliber stamp on the barrel in one pic, and I see what appears to maybe be a " 38 " in the other pic.
This is one case where I wish I had been wrong. A .32H&R would have been so much cooler. I still do not think I would have wanted one though. Too much plastic on that gun for my tastes.
Quote:
Those cylinder walls are tiny, though! Very un-rugerish.
I do not think this gun will share the Ruger reputation for toughness. It will be a standard revolver...which kind of negates the reason why I like Ruger. With this being a new design and no stronger than a Smith why would I not just buy the time proven Smith?
Playboypenguin is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.01915 seconds with 8 queries