|
I wouldn't necessarily include magazine restrictions in my challenge to an AWB because I think it unnecessarily complicates the issue.
I would challenge a ban on semiautomatic rifles, handguns and shotguns. I think if handguns are protected arms then rifles and shotguns are as well. I can't see any logical argument to the contrary. Because the law is broad on restricting firearms I think you have to argue the firearm portions broadly.
While still not very compelling to me, I think an argument for magazine capcity restrictions is more compelling than an argument for banning semi auto firearms. Like I said I don't find it that compelling an argument but I think it is a different discussion.
How is the state of California going to argue for it's AWB? It's going to say that bayonet lugs , pistol grips, collapsible stocks, etc.. make the weapon more dangerous. But none of those things do anything but make the firearm look more dangerous or unusual.
|