Quote:
|
Originally Posted by gyvel
But you still have to consider all the roadblocks, i.e. the $200.00 tax which, at one time, was prohibitve and is still a nuisance factor, the arbitrary behavior of many law enforcement officials who refuse to sign off on applications, and the social stigma attached to FA by the misinformed American Public, as reasons why "few people legally owned them."
|
Speculation and no evidence to show reliably that the NFA "caused" FA to not be in common use. I don't think a court would buy it. I don't either. As stated before I thik the evidence points to the idea that most citizens don't view FA as a suitable SD weapon. That idea gets skewed on a gun forum with rabidly progun folk but being popular in gun circles does not make a type of firearm common to most of society.
__________________
"God and the Soldier we adore, in time of trouble but not before. When the danger's past and the wrong been righted, God is forgotten and the Soldier slighted."
Anonymous Soldier.
|