No one in this thread has said body armor
should be regulated, or that any law-abiding citizen should be legally barred from owning it. Some of us think it's a bit silly to want it, absent a good reason, but I haven't noticed
anyone arguing for legal restrictions. Whether or not it
could be, or whether armor is protected by the Second Amendment, are completely different questions from that of whether it ought to be, which, unless I've missed something, we've all answered with a resounding "No."
Quote:
|
anddontconfusemyraisedeyebrowwithsupportforalaw
|
Exactly. Well tmesified, WA. I envy you the eel, by the way.