View Single Post
Old February 28, 2014, 07:37 PM   #215
62coltnavy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 1, 2011
Posts: 356
I agree with Michel on the standing issue--and suspect that her prior arguments will bite her in the butt. Only the dissenting justice thinks that she should have involved herself.

The "other" case the Michel does not name is Richards v. Prieto that was argued the same day as Peruta, but which was filed by CalGuns. The attorneys for the NRA and the attorneys for CalGuns have been at war over these competing cases from day one--and that pssing match as to who is "responsible" for what continues even after Peruta was decided. Reminds me of why I lurk at CalGuns but have never joined.
62coltnavy is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.03644 seconds with 8 queries