View Single Post
Old September 8, 2012, 10:54 PM   #380
Al Norris
Moderator Emeritus
 
Join Date: June 29, 2000
Location: Rupert, Idaho
Posts: 9,660
In the slowwww case of Dearth v. Holder (docket), we have this:

Quote:
08/27/2012 MINUTE ORDER: The parties shall appear on September 10, 2012 in Courtroom 27A at 3:30 PM for a motions hearing on the pending 23[RECAP] and 25[RECAP] Motions for Summary Judgment. The Court will hear argument on both motions. Signed by Judge Robert L. Wilkins on 8/27/2012. (tcb) (Entered: 08/27/2012)

08/31/2012 39 NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY by ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit)(Riess, Daniel) (Entered: 08/31/2012)

09/07/2012 40 RESPONSE re 39 NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY filed by STEPHEN DEARTH, SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION, INC.. (Gura, Alan) (Entered: 09/07/2012)
The minute order for the hearing is about the MSJ (#23) by Alan Gura and the MJP/MSJ (#25) by Holder.

Doc #39 is Holder noticing the Court of the Hightower decision.

Doc #40 is Alan Gura's response to that notice. What is Interesting is that in this 5 page response, I think we get a glimpse of what Gura intends in asking for reconsideration of the Hightower decision.
Al Norris is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.02713 seconds with 8 queries