View Single Post
Old August 14, 2013, 10:27 AM   #7
JimDandy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 8, 2012
Posts: 2,556
Quote:
I think the issue then remains her FOID and the Law is the Law. I stand with the law because bending the rules for one person can have more negative consequences than positive. "It rains on the just as well as the unjust".
Quote:
Originally Posted by St. Augustine
An unjust law is no law at all.
The entire point of a judicial challenge to a law is both to get an unjust law overturned so the legislature can create a just one in it's place if the law served a just purpose, AND to provide The People with one avenue to their First Amendment right to petition the government for a redress of their grievances.

An 18 year old that has aged out of the State system has no parents with the capacity to sign such permission. At that point if the State is their guardian, can the State provide such a permission slip? For that matter, can the State decline one, now that the Second Amendment has been incorporated against the States?

Are you suggesting a curfew from 1201 PM to 11:59 AM is unjust, but people should not challenge it in the courts, but instead work to change it in their 2 minutes of freedom every day?
JimDandy is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.02971 seconds with 8 queries