I have shot 9mm Barnaul, and had some primer issues. This was for range practice and some competition use, so not critical to my well being.
I have also been offered Barnaul .308 for my rifle. It is cheap and acceptable for practice, but I was warned that it would not be particularly accurate beyond 100m.
So the question is, is €30 a year (based on your 100rd estimate), compared to €125 a year worth it when you know that the ammo will probably not be doing your shooting justice. How will you know that you aim is improving/getting worse if the ammo will not reliably show up your mistakes or achievements?
An extra €95 a year would give you the possibility of far more beneficial training. For example, investigate Norma Jatkmatch ammo. I would say avoid it: false economy!!
__________________
When the right to effective self-defence is denied, that right to self-defence which remains is essentially symbolic. Freedom: Please enjoy responsibly.
|