The Firing Line Forums - View Single Post

62coltnavy · November 27, 2012, 09:42 PM

Press, you are like WAAAY out of date. The decision to which you refer was in 2004, and ultimately, in 2009, the Court held that actions against federally licensed manufacturers were pre-empted by the PLCAA. Glock and the federally licensed retailer were dismissed. The only claims that survived were asserted against China North, who was not a federally licensed firearms manufacturer. See 565 F.3d 1126.

November 27, 2012, 09:42 PM	#3
62coltnavy Senior Member Join Date: February 1, 2011 Posts: 356	Press, you are like WAAAY out of date. The decision to which you refer was in 2004, and ultimately, in 2009, the Court held that actions against federally licensed manufacturers were pre-empted by the PLCAA. Glock and the federally licensed retailer were dismissed. The only claims that survived were asserted against China North, who was not a federally licensed firearms manufacturer. See 565 F.3d 1126.