View Single Post
Old November 23, 2008, 12:28 PM   #2
Double Naught Spy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 8, 2001
Location: Forestburg, Montague Cnty, TX
Posts: 12,717
So you present a story of an event of unknown specifics (date, location, police department) but you recall all the specific of the numbers of actors, manner of dress, activities, having seen video and read reports, but can't reference any of them here and instead reference a completely unrelated report from LA?

From the story you present, you then reach the conclusion that the police response was due to "group think" and the result was an unnecessary response. The fact that it was unnecessary seems to be based on the video you saw where everyone came out without conflict.

Do you think maybe they came out without conflict because they realized they were no longer superior in size and power?

So what is the point of your post? So what if officers engaged in group think in order to bring a successful conclusion to a potentially explosive situation?
__________________
"If you look through your scope and see your shoe, aim higher." -- said to me by my 11 year old daughter before going out for hogs 8/13/2011
My Hunting Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/HornHillRange
Double Naught Spy is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.02410 seconds with 8 queries