View Single Post
Old September 8, 2008, 08:33 AM   #12
carguychris
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 20, 2007
Location: Richardson, TX
Posts: 7,523
Quote:
If Glock made the 25 and 28 in the US, they would be perfectly legal, but I guess they don't see enough of a market to try to compete with all of the other manufacturers of blowback 380s in the US already.
I suspect a strong factor is that many .380 buyers are extremely price-concious. It's possible that Glock feels there's simply not enough money in the venture; lowering the price to Bersa/Kel-Tec/LCP levels would cut their profit margin too much, while pricing the guns higher would limit sales. Glock is making PLENTY of money on their larger-caliber product line. Why even bother?

This is the same reason that S&W has sold very, very few .380s or pocket .22s in their corporate history.

It may also have to do with S&W's other reason that they've never pushed these type of guns very hard... their marketing folks are concerned that they will cheapen the Glock brand too much.
__________________
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam. This is bowling. There are rules... MARK IT ZERO!!" - Walter Sobchak
carguychris is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.02143 seconds with 8 queries