View Single Post
Old February 18, 2013, 01:55 PM   #37
lcpiper
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 15, 2011
Posts: 1,405
Quote:
Three, if it did pass, allowing one gun or multiple guns to be transferred with an approved transaction that only notes the seller and the approval of a buyer with no record of the gun or guns involved being transmitted there would be no way to track individual guns or groups of guns. Even if they cheated and kept the information it would only tell them the name of someone who bought/received a gun without telling them what they owned.
Here is the problem I have.

So we give in, hey this sounds ok right?

But after several years the anti-gunners have another supportive President and Congress in place and there is another tragedy. This time they say "Hey, we can't figure out where this guy got his gun from so we don't know if it was legally purchased or not. We need to change the background check system.

The left step leads to the right step, back to the next step. All these steps are going down the wrong road. You can't prevent these things from happening in this way. You can't stop it this way. Mack59 I am sorry man, but nothing good can come of this thinking and you need to stop thinking that you have to give them something to appease them. They will not be appeased, only left hungry for more.

They believe they can make the world a better place and they don't care what they have to do in order to accomplish their goals.

Watch the movie Serenity if you haven't yet.
__________________
Colt M1911, AR-15 | S&W Model 19, Model 27| SIG P238 | Berreta 85B Cheetah | Ruger Blackhawk .357MAG, Bearcat "Shopkeeper" .22LR| Remington Marine Magnum SP 12GA., Model 700 SPS .223
lcpiper is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.02045 seconds with 8 queries