Quote:
That analogy is... not analogous.
|
My point being that threats are not actions, and in this type of scenerio rarely turn into actions. So it is important what rights and liberties we conceed in the name of stopping something that
could happen as opposed to something that is in the process of happening.
Again I'm in no way suggesting this kind of thing to be taken lightly, BUT was the confiscation of his fathers legal and
secured guns really necessary if that is indeed what happened? In my opinion it was not.