The Firing Line Forums - View Single Post

Carry_24/7 · February 15, 2012, 01:05 PM

I handled one in my LGS...its brings nothing exciting to the table of existing smaller, thinner, lighter 9s. It should be thinner, I couldn't believe it's thickness.

Its comparable to the LC9 (except it appears thicker) and "nowhere" in the same field as the PPS except it's cheaper.

I'd carry a Glock 26 before the Nano, but I'll keep my PPS instead.

February 15, 2012, 01:05 PM	#7
Carry_24/7 Senior Member Join Date: June 5, 2011 Posts: 801	I handled one in my LGS...its brings nothing exciting to the table of existing smaller, thinner, lighter 9s. It should be thinner, I couldn't believe it's thickness. Its comparable to the LC9 (except it appears thicker) and "nowhere" in the same field as the PPS except it's cheaper. I'd carry a Glock 26 before the Nano, but I'll keep my PPS instead.