I don't understand how 9/11 has anything to do with, or serves as any justifiable legal basis, for the dismissal of the case. It seems like the 9/11 events would be completely irrelevant to the charges and the case.
In the interest of justice, huh?!? LOL.
Sounds like another way of saying, "because I want to." How's that for an abuse of discretion? (I know, that's probably not the standard of review in this case, but what the heck.)