The Firing Line Forums - View Single Post

Pond, James Pond · April 6, 2013, 01:38 AM

I have a Prostaff.

It was the first of the two scopes I have bought. It sits on my .22 rifle and is a 3-9x50.

It is clear, solid and hassle free. It is also basic. I don't need anything more from my scope. At .22 distances I can make all my range adjustments with the BDC reticle. I could do the same at CF distances except that I find it hard to judge longer distances.

Would you be happy with it? Yes, I believe so.
Are there better scopes for you out there? Yes, I believe so.

In other words, only you can decide if it is the best for you. In terms of build it is good quality. In terms of features, only you can decide.

April 6, 2013, 01:38 AM	#9
Pond, James Pond Senior Member Join Date: July 12, 2011 Location: Top of the Baltic stack Posts: 6,079	I have a Prostaff. It was the first of the two scopes I have bought. It sits on my .22 rifle and is a 3-9x50. It is clear, solid and hassle free. It is also basic. I don't need anything more from my scope. At .22 distances I can make all my range adjustments with the BDC reticle. I could do the same at CF distances except that I find it hard to judge longer distances. Would you be happy with it? Yes, I believe so. Are there better scopes for you out there? Yes, I believe so. In other words, only you can decide if it is the best for you. In terms of build it is good quality. In terms of features, only you can decide. __________________ When the right to effective self-defence is denied, that right to self-defence which remains is essentially symbolic. Freedom: Please enjoy responsibly.