Quote:
Originally Posted by Exit Wound
It seems to me that if you're a responsible, law abiding, non-criminal, you would be in favor of universal background checks. It just seems logical to keep deadly weapons out of the hands of felons, the mentally ill, and, frankly, people who owe taxes or are in default of federal loans.
Is there something I'm missing?
|
It appears to me that you are confusing "right" and "privilege." Do you really mean that you believe people who owe taxes or haven't paid off a loan are not entitled to defend themselves from assault with deadly force?
Do you understand the difference between a "right" and a "privilege"?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Exit Wound
I am a huge proponent of the 2nd amendment,
|
With respect, Sir ... No, you are NOT a "huge" proponent of the 2nd Amendment. The fact that you are apparently serious about accepting the restrictions ("infringements") you ask about is all the proof we need to see that.