The Firing Line Forums - View Single Post

lechiffre · January 16, 2013, 05:58 AM

Beretta > Taurus

Having written that, there is nothing wrong with the PT92, it's just that the Beretta is better.

I don't think that this is an opinion, I don't think anyone, having examined them both side by side, could declare the Taurus superior. The Beretta has better fit finish and machining it's that simple.

I can understand preferring the features of the Taurus over those of the the Beretta.

It's all about the safety position. Taurus kept the original position. Beretta moved theirs to the slide.

I do not own either one. I am open to owning either. Even though I believe the Beretta is a bit better, I would rather have an earlier Taurus. One with the non-decocker safety, smaller slide serrations, smaller roll marks, and magazine catch at the trigger guard.

January 16, 2013, 05:58 AM	#23
lechiffre Senior Member Join Date: February 3, 2008 Location: phoenix,az Posts: 513	Beretta > Taurus Having written that, there is nothing wrong with the PT92, it's just that the Beretta is better. I don't think that this is an opinion, I don't think anyone, having examined them both side by side, could declare the Taurus superior. The Beretta has better fit finish and machining it's that simple. I can understand preferring the features of the Taurus over those of the the Beretta. It's all about the safety position. Taurus kept the original position. Beretta moved theirs to the slide. I do not own either one. I am open to owning either. Even though I believe the Beretta is a bit better, I would rather have an earlier Taurus. One with the non-decocker safety, smaller slide serrations, smaller roll marks, and magazine catch at the trigger guard. __________________ if God hadn't meant us to shoot he wouldn't have given us trigger fingers do the interns get glocks ?