View Single Post
Old April 7, 2006, 01:59 PM   #17
Ben Swenson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 17, 2000
Posts: 1,210
Quote:
Not exactly. The original form as written in the state law, specifically prohibited the inclusion of any information about the firearm. Now with it being replaced by the 4473, the information about the fiream will be on file so I stand by that statement.
I agree, it expands the information that the ISP has. That's Not Good. However, I am not too worried. If the ISP comes to your door to confiscate your guns, does it really matter if they know you have purchased 2 1911s and a Glock retail inside the state of Indiana or just sure that you've bought 3 guns?
Quote:
If I read your response correctly, you are saying the 4473s were already going to ISP? That's news to me.
No, just saying the 4473 replaces an existing form that went to the ISP. That form already told them you were buying a handgun.

I don't like it, but I view this on a whole as an incremental gain.
Ben Swenson is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.02522 seconds with 8 queries