View Single Post
Old January 6, 2013, 08:45 PM   #8
Tom Servo
Staff
 
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Location: Foothills of the Appalachians
Posts: 13,059
Quote:
Now we get to McDonald v. Chicago in which SCOTUS ruled that 2A guaranteed the right to own a firearm not only at the federal level, but that the right was incorporated against state and local governments via the Due Process clause of 14A.
At the moment, the problem is that the exact contours of the right in question have yet to be hashed out. Essentially, we got recognition for the right to have some sort of handgun in the home, and we got it incorporated against the states. That's it.

So, if Peoria wants to ban ownership of some handguns and leave others, it's not unconstitutional at the moment. If Boise wants to acknowledge a right to ownership in the home but not a right to carry, that doesn't step on the Supreme Court's toes either.

As we make more progress on the legal definition of the right, we'll make more headway in its protection.
__________________
Sometimes it’s nice not to destroy the world for a change.
--Randall Munroe
Tom Servo is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.03424 seconds with 8 queries