Yes...because having departmental policies being reviewed and altered by the courts for the second time in 10 years says it's supported by the courts and completely above board...
Even so, you have yet to show that a) it is effective and b) that it's only the "corner boys and dopers" as you would put it being stopped and searched. You keep on making statements in support without actually providing substance to those statements.
To put some of this in context, the reported rate of illegal drug use in NYC in 2009 was roughly
16%, if the "corner boys and dopers" are the ones being targeted in your mind, why is it that the total non-firearms contraband discovery rate is roughly 2%?(see link in previous post) Seems to be a pretty large discrepancy there for what you would claim is targeted at those most likely to be carrying drugs. Based on their own reporting "actions indicative of drugs transactions" are less than 10% of the total stops. So again, how is it that the "corner boys and dopers" are being targeted?