|
I get it, Glen, and I see your point. But, until we have any reason to doubt his story, justice tells us to presume innocence. Since he has been truthful on every other salient point, even before he had any idea that there were witnesses and evidence, I think we owe him that. I certainly would hope to get at least that much of a benefit of the doubt, assuming I was in the right, and assuming I had been completely truthful as he apparently has. There is nothing wrong with skepticism, but I think we must be fair here.
|