Quote:
Originally Posted by born2climb
So we've devolved to the point that a person has the right to self-defense only when using a politically acceptable weapon? Where is common sense in all this? Who got to decide that a murderer/robber/rapist had such "rights"?
|
No, that entirely mischaracterizes the issue. The defender has not been deprived of his right to SD, nor is it illegal to use handloads for SD or HD. Just because something is legal doesn't make it a good idea, though.
As others have noted, though, that really wasn't the original question.