The Firing Line Forums - View Single Post

HighValleyRanch · January 24, 2012, 11:04 PM

Well, I have had and shot a few..... 26, 19,17, 29 and 20.
The glock 29 is closer is size to the 23. It was my match for the 19.
It is a little wider, but almost the same grip length as the 23.

The 20 is slightly larger than the full size glocks.

The 29 was just as easy to conceal as the 19, but slightly harder than the 26.

BUT, it is more versatile. The lower end of the 10mm spectrum is the same as .40, and then it goes beyond what a .40 could ever achieve.
So anyone that says that the 10mm is too powerful for SD isn't considering the broad spectrum of ammo available and pigeon holing it for their argument.

The 29 was a breeze to shoot, as was the 20. The 20 is easier to manipulate, because the 29 is a fairly fat short gun.

If I had it to do again, I would either get the 20 and chop it to the 29 grip length, or get the 29 SF.

January 24, 2012, 11:04 PM	#4
HighValleyRanch Senior Member Join Date: July 15, 2005 Posts: 4,066	Well, I have had and shot a few..... 26, 19,17, 29 and 20. The glock 29 is closer is size to the 23. It was my match for the 19. It is a little wider, but almost the same grip length as the 23. The 20 is slightly larger than the full size glocks. The 29 was just as easy to conceal as the 19, but slightly harder than the 26. BUT, it is more versatile. The lower end of the 10mm spectrum is the same as .40, and then it goes beyond what a .40 could ever achieve. So anyone that says that the 10mm is too powerful for SD isn't considering the broad spectrum of ammo available and pigeon holing it for their argument. The 29 was a breeze to shoot, as was the 20. The 20 is easier to manipulate, because the 29 is a fairly fat short gun. If I had it to do again, I would either get the 20 and chop it to the 29 grip length, or get the 29 SF. __________________ From the sweet grass to the slaughter house; From birth until death; We travel between these two eternities........from 'Broken Trail"