The Firing Line Forums - View Single Post - Anything better than 32 Mag or 32-20 for reloadable "22"?

ZeusOne · March 27, 2001, 01:24 PM

If I'm not mistaken, didn't Ruger just introduce a new sixgun in .32 mag? So the caliber is not a bad choice.

My only caution is cost of reloading components (if that's even a concern for you). Components in the "common" calibers - 9mm, 38s/357m, 44s/44m and 45acp - can all be had fairly cheap because of marketplace factors, and frequent specials further help keep costs down.

However, if you already have the die sets for the "common" calibers, and got some cash to burn, why not? We'd all like more toys.

March 27, 2001, 01:24 PM	#11
ZeusOne Senior Member Join Date: January 6, 2000 Location: The hills of Western MD Posts: 237	If I'm not mistaken, didn't Ruger just introduce a new sixgun in .32 mag? So the caliber is not a bad choice. My only caution is cost of reloading components (if that's even a concern for you). Components in the "common" calibers - 9mm, 38s/357m, 44s/44m and 45acp - can all be had fairly cheap because of marketplace factors, and frequent specials further help keep costs down. However, if you already have the die sets for the "common" calibers, and got some cash to burn, why not? We'd all like more toys.