|
I have some free advice for you, and it is worth at least what you are paying for it.
In practical terms, there are jurisdictions that would permit you to use deadly force to stop that person, and jurisdictions that wouldn't, but you should recognize that what you would be doing would be protecting not yourself, but future victims, most likely residents of that jurisdiction.
If the residents of that jurisdiction have not made it crystal-clear to you that they WANT you to protect them in that way (i.e. shoot a fleeing felon in the back if that is the only way you can stop him), I would recommend to you that you let them protect themselves the same way you did, at the same expense of money, time, and bureaucratic nuisance. You don't owe anything at all to a bunch of people who elect democrats, national socialists and other assorted gun-grabbers/trashers of our Constitution.
In other words, what part of Virginia do you live in?
|