|
Don P, I've spoken with Mas in person about this issue.
As far as things like BHP magazine safeties go, there is the possibility that an overzealous prosecutor or unethical tort attorney could try to say, "The defendant has such disregard for safety that he removed a safety device!"
However, there has not, to date, been a case where that has actually happened.
There have been cases where litigants have tried to claim accidental discharge of a cocked DA revolver; Mas told us about one such attempt, where the sear of the gun had been modified in such a way that the gun could not be cocked, and the litigant's expert was made to look like an idiot.
But even after talking with Mas (whom I like and respect), I am just not worried about the disconnect safety.
And if I need an expert, I have Mas and/or Marty Hayes on tap.
Which brings up another point: The Armed Citizen's Legal Defense Network. Marty Hayes runs it. Anybody interested in an aftermath strategy would be well-advised to look into ACLDN.
|