View Single Post
Old September 5, 2011, 01:00 PM   #55
zukiphile
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 13, 2005
Posts: 4,439
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glenn Dee
First allow me to present my bonifides.
Glenn, you have my apology if you read my question as a doubt of your good faith. It wasn't.

My observation was about the logic of denying that attitude or countenance are observed in an interaction, while simultaneously noting how they affect a PO's treatment of an individual.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Glenn Dee
I dont think I'd be able to treat everyone equally if I got side tracked by their attitude. 99 9/10's% of all people want to be treated with respect, and fairness. If and when treated with respect, and fairness people tend to respond in a positive way.

Also when you dont respond to a persons attitude they soon get bored with themselves and forget what they were angry at in the first place. When your concerned with a persons attitude you become at their effect. They begin to steer your attitude, and actions. Then you become part of the problem, and not part of the soloution.
That sounds like a very fine outlook.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Glenn Dee
Perhaps your confused with what the police actually do.
On the contrary, it is informed by what they do. Given your experience, I know you will not claim your attitude to be universal.
zukiphile is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.03704 seconds with 8 queries