Quote:
Originally Posted by Glenn Dee
First allow me to present my bonifides.
|
Glenn, you have my apology if you read my question as a doubt of your good faith. It wasn't.
My observation was about the logic of denying that attitude or countenance are observed in an interaction, while simultaneously noting how they affect a PO's treatment of an individual.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glenn Dee
I dont think I'd be able to treat everyone equally if I got side tracked by their attitude. 99 9/10's% of all people want to be treated with respect, and fairness. If and when treated with respect, and fairness people tend to respond in a positive way.
Also when you dont respond to a persons attitude they soon get bored with themselves and forget what they were angry at in the first place. When your concerned with a persons attitude you become at their effect. They begin to steer your attitude, and actions. Then you become part of the problem, and not part of the soloution.
|
That sounds like a very fine outlook.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glenn Dee
Perhaps your confused with what the police actually do.
|
On the contrary, it is informed by what they do. Given your experience, I know you will not claim your attitude to be universal.