|
My two cents is that IDPA does not go far enough.
I agree that parts of the IDPA rules seem silly, but I think that they are there for the gamers. IF the rule was "stock combat gun" and "practical holster", I think it'd be a lot easier.
Furthermore, I think the engagement rules should be a little stricter, though the little I have seen of IDPA shows that they do encourage the use of cover.
IPSC might as well use paint pellets or simuition, because it has nothing to do with Combat.
IDPA is not the place for "experimenting" or "testing/development" or new gear, technology or sight systems. IDPA shout stick with defensive shooting, it is the best we've got. Do your testing at a range, outside of competition, that is what I say.
To call for a meeting between IDPA and IPSC is like saying "Let's ruin IDPA."
------------------
-Essayons
|