View Single Post
Old October 13, 2005, 03:36 AM   #3
Bravo25
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 19, 2005
Location: Kansas
Posts: 432
Quote:
As far a the ethical side, I really don't see it as being any different from the methods used by natural predators (wolves, etc.).
Except that natural prediators don't sit a few hundred yards away with a high powered weapon, and massive optics. They call this gathering. Not hunting. That is why I don't like feeders either.

Of course the flip side of this is if you are going to be totally ethical, take the animal on his turf, on equal ground.

I have no real qualms about weapons (per se) to equal the athletic abilty, size, and strength of the game, but I think I'll teach my kids to track, read sign, and hunt. Then you have earned it, and can take pride in it.

JMHO
__________________
If more laws restricting our rights will make us free from harm, why aren't we safe yet? We are only less free.

When faced with impossible overwhelming odds, prudance would dictate the only thing left is to figure out what is possible, and to do it.

Punishment for all crimes should increase until the recitivism rate approaches zero.
Bravo25 is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.04214 seconds with 8 queries