The Firing Line Forums - View Single Post

PetahW · January 20, 2013, 11:17 AM

I've used a LoPro on several rifles, and actually prefer them, since they are a very minimalist sight.

While the LoPro is adjustable for elevation, any windage adjustments must be done via the front sight - which has never been a problem in my case(s), on 7 rifles, so far.

The reason it's NP is that the Lopro sits directly above the bore C/L, and in the instances where I've actually had to make a windage adjustment, the total front sight blade movement to achieve zero was never more than 1/16"-3/32", aka: minimal.

.

January 20, 2013, 11:17 AM	#9
PetahW Senior Member Join Date: September 19, 2008 Posts: 4,678	I've used a LoPro on several rifles, and actually prefer them, since they are a very minimalist sight. While the LoPro is adjustable for elevation, any windage adjustments must be done via the front sight - which has never been a problem in my case(s), on 7 rifles, so far. The reason it's NP is that the Lopro sits directly above the bore C/L, and in the instances where I've actually had to make a windage adjustment, the total front sight blade movement to achieve zero was never more than 1/16"-3/32", aka: minimal. .