Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Frank Ettin
His so called claim is essentially the hypothesis that an employer may reasonably be concerned about the potential liability that could be associated with employees have no or minimal training could present a liability risk.
|
No, it is more this:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by RX-79G
I doubt most gas station owners view their $9 an hour employees as the type of people that are likely to always make great life decisions.
|
or this:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by RX-79G
Just reading this board for a few weeks would convince me that the average gun enthusiast is fairly unlikely to be a practical minded, well trained and smart weapon user.
|
Those are claims and there is no evidence to support them. Just opinion.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by RX-79G
Your so called data
|
Data from numerous academic studies from a well known and respected researcher is "So-called data"? What data would you accept?
As to the risk, again look at what actually happens. Look at the stats. Other than these three anecdotes you keep dutifully repeating what do the overall stats about DGUs and all these CCW holders shooting up innocent people. Where is your "so-called" data?