Quote:
Originally Posted by Buzzard Bait
In a world of bonded bullets and expanding copper bullets and other high performance bullets do you think if Jack O'Conner were alive today that the 243 might be his 270? In his time using the smaller 270 vs. 3006 was radical people thought it to small or to light for elk and large deer he proved them wrong. Today with premium bullets the 243 is a very effective round.
bb
|
Is the .243 as flat a trajectory as the .270? I'm looking for long range accuracy with the least recoil. Mainly for target shooting. Hunting would be secondary.