Since allowing a three year old to acces a gun violates a california statute can't glock make a claim under the PLCAA?
The PLCAA prohibits suits against manufacturers where the injury is the result of unlawful misuse?
Quote:
|
The term “unlawful misuse” means conduct that violates a statute, ordinance, or regulation as it relates to the use of a qualified product.
|
Probably why the plaintiffs are arguing that glocks design was defective.