|
My take on the whole thing is, perhaps, a little different due to my viewpoint. I don't own a TV and I deliberately didn't read any online news about the case. I would have been a prime pick for juror, I guess. I genuinely come into the thing totally ignorant of anything.
Anyway, I have seen some of the trial on TV at the gym while I'm on the treadmill. I can't hear the sound. The closed caption is on so I can see (sort of) the words they're saying but I don't get the verbal inflection/emotion. And a lot of the cc verbage is incorrectly spelled etc. In short, I'm seeing it sort of like a deaf guy.
From a purely visual standpoint, I see the defense lawyer and the prosecutor, and an occasional shot of stone faced Zimmerman. From my limited view (only) my guess is that Zim prevails. The old guy defense atty just looks more honest than the younger, politically hungry DA. Zim just looks like a hard working, non-vigilante kind of guy.
Purely a visual observation. Deaf justice.
Sgt Lumpy
|