Read the decision
here.
I've only skimmed it, but from what I'm seeing, it is a very bad decision. The panel has dismissed the 1A claim and while the case was vacated (as to the 2A claim) and remanded, it was in such a way that the panel has given the district court a roadmap on how to dismiss the 2A claim in its entirety.
After describing how the Alameda ordinance came into being, the panel concludes with this remark:
Quote:
Whatever the intent of the Ordinance, the Nordykes assert
that its effect was to ban gun shows on county property.
|
Whatever the intent??? The panel just finished describing in detail the intent!
I may have more to say later, after I have completely read and digested the ruling.