View Single Post
Old August 19, 2013, 11:32 AM   #42
JimDandy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 8, 2012
Posts: 2,556
Quote:
by the time anything got off the ground they'd likely have gotten remedy by default by being 21.
There have been cases where someone was allowed to continue their suit after getting/not getting remedy because actual resolution in the time frame provided by the court system was unlikely. I think the Roe v Wade set of cases was one of them in fact.

Quote:
Sigcurious, according to the pleadings, this question was brought up. There was no means for a person who "aged out" of the system to receive any permission whatsoever.
Further, exactly how would the State be able to provide or more importantly deny that permission under constitutional grounds? If said party has a right to bear arms, and the state cannot infringe that right without due process on specific criteria, they cannot backdoor a denial on other criteria for aged out wards of the state constitutionally, that would I assume as a layman, open up acres of 14A violations.
JimDandy is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.03423 seconds with 8 queries