Thread: .357sig
View Single Post
Old May 22, 2013, 05:06 AM   #68
silvermane_1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 6, 2011
Location: Burien,WA
Posts: 897
Quote:
The .357 sig was a solution looking for a problem, but remains a viable weapon system even though you can buy .40 S&W rounds that will do the same thing. You can always go light with the .40 and glean the same ballistic response, but cannot go anywhere near as heavy with the sig. And without changing barrels.
that's not the story of .357sig, the story of the .357sig is it was design to give 125 gr. 357 mag. performance out of a hi-cap 9mm service sized semi-auto pistol, that's was the "solution" to the "problem" at the time, i tire of hearing about how the .357sig is the "solution" to a "problem" that doesn't exist or the "answer" to a "question" no one asked.
the .357sig exist to do what it was designed to do, nothing more nothing less. and stating that "well a .40 S&W can do it better" or "9mm +P+ can do the same or better" or .38 Super, 10mm auto ect., if that was the case the .357sig wouldn't exist.
__________________
Rugers:SR1911 CMD,MK 3 .22lr 6",Sec. Six '76 liberty .357 4",SRH .480 Ruger 7.5",Mini-14 188 5.56/.233 18.5", Marlins: 795 .22lr 16.5",30aw 30-30 20",Mossberg:Mav. 88 Tact. 12 ga, 18.5",ATR 100 .270 Win. 22",S&W:SW9VE
9mm 4",Springfield:XD .357sig 4", AKs:CAI PSL-54C, WASR 10/63, WW74,SLR-106c
silvermane_1 is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.03042 seconds with 8 queries