|
Yep
I have to second this:
I prefer Isosceles for several reasons.
1. After reviewing videos of several shootings, the predominant stance is Isosceles. "natural instinctive reaction"?
2. Natural point of aim. It is one of the fundamentals of marksmanship correct? No muscles are twisted to get into position. Your toes are pointed at the target. If you simply raise your hands to form a triangle, the tip (gun) is naturally aligned.
3. Mobility. You can roll left or right to shoot around cover or create distance.
Linebackers use a similar position for fast movement in any direction.
4. Commonality of tactics. This is the same as the shotgun or subgun position. Why switch?
Your results may vary. I like isosceles because it seems more natural with more consistant results.
PS:
It is a good one if you are on the move, if you are just drawing and aiming and shooting I drop down with both knees bent, feet about shoulder width and facing the target, at the same time you raise the pistol. Smaller target.
Quicker to get on target.
Using the Isosceles if you are not careful, you will change the dominant eye. Then you must practice that eye also, good to keep both open.
SW
|