View Single Post
Old December 28, 2013, 07:44 PM   #16
Double Naught Spy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 8, 2001
Location: Forestburg, Montague Cnty, TX
Posts: 12,717
Quote:
Apparently this couple falls//fell in the anti-gun (or the Pollyanna) demographic.
So because they didn't buy a gun after the wife was attacked, they must be anti-gun or Pollyanna demographic? That is some pretty silly logic.

I have met several folks in CHL courses who were the victims of crimes and who didn't arm themselves until after being victimized and none rushed right out and bought a gun immediately.

Quote:
As in nearly every case, the fight goes to the fighter, not the weapon. A good fighter with a poor weapon wins far more than a poor fight with a good weapon.
Interesting logic. I guess one really doesn't need firearms after all. Of wait, I thought it was guns that were supposed to be the great equalizer, allowing those who aren't great fighters to defend themselves against those who are superior fighters to them. So which is it?
__________________
"If you look through your scope and see your shoe, aim higher." -- said to me by my 11 year old daughter before going out for hogs 8/13/2011
My Hunting Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/HornHillRange
Double Naught Spy is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.03636 seconds with 8 queries