Quote:
|
Originally Posted by David Armstrong
as they are designed to persuade, not inform.
|
As are many "studies" as many that the Joyce Foundation produces. I think the debate illuminated the differences and explained to the layman well what the research showed.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by David Armstrong
We've seen that you don't understand basic research issues many times before, that is only further support for it.
|
That is incorrect and insulting.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by David Armstrong
Perhaps you are having trouble understanding yourself? Your statement specifically refers to Mr. Donahue and the debate.
|
No, it is referring to the Donohue article Glenn posted just before my conclusions about the article. Donohue did not talk about LE CCW expense in the debate.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by David Armstrong
Then we don't get nonsense like "CCW reduces crime rates".
|
Apparently some academics believe CCW reduce crime. What research have you done on that subject?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by David Armstrong
The YouTube site you posted is a bad example of how to learn about an issue, IMO.
|
And I disagree as stated before.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by David Armstrong
I go back to glenn's statement, "It might be useful to read such if one is serious in the debate."
|
And I read and commented on the Donohue article he posted which IMO shed no better light on the discussion than the debate.