Quote:
|
This doesn't seem to bad, limiting firearm purchasing to once a month might actually increase availability of firearms and reduce the cost. In a broad spectrum, you'd have more of a chance to buy a firearm that otherwise might have been purchased.
|
How exactly would that work? Since very few people buy more than one gun a month now, in fact most won't buy more than one per year, it would have almost zero effect on supply and demand.
Quote:
|
I am glad lawmakers are not the brightest bunch otherwise they would have figured out how to eleminate firearms by now.
|
It's not their dubious intelligence that prevents firearms elimination, it's the constitution.
Quote:
|
Just cut ammo supply, thats not guaranteed in the constitution, you can bear all the arms you want but cut the ammo the gun is worthless.
|
In the same way that government can't require you to keep your firearm locked in such a way as to prevent it's immediate use, denying ammo would be denying the right to keep and bear for self defense or any other lawful purpose. Heller vs DC said that policy option is off the table.