I agree, a ban on ARs would be quite constitutional under a view of the handgun in the home for self-defense.
Granted the decision is a great step forward as compared to the view that NO guns, no way for self-defense.
But, given our own rhetoric suggests that we can do almost all the self-defense we need with a wonder handgun like the Judge (
), one could see bans being successfully promoted for other guns.
Such rules would have to be fought on the political and legislative level as compared to the constitutional one, if I understand the decision.
Nor can gun bans on campus or other locations be constitutionally challenged, in the near future.