The Firing Line Forums - View Single Post

dr holliday · May 14, 2009, 04:20 PM

I understand the desire to understand "dangerous and unusual".

But Heller is wrong.

The 2nd says "arms", not just FIREarms.

And the militia component of the 2nd is perhaps more important than the self-defense aspect that Heller focused upon...
.

May 14, 2009, 04:20 PM	#40
dr holliday Junior Member Join Date: May 14, 2009 Posts: 1	I understand the desire to understand "dangerous and unusual". But Heller is wrong. The 2nd says "arms", not just FIREarms. And the militia component of the 2nd is perhaps more important than the self-defense aspect that Heller focused upon... .