View Single Post
Old May 7, 2010, 09:09 AM   #1
LordTio3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 5, 2010
Location: Bloomington, Indiana
Posts: 850
Glock Volunteers Wanted...

I've finally decided that I want more information on an issue, and you Glock owners out there may be able to help me.

My carry weapon is a Glock 19 9mm, and the issue in question involves a loading proceedure.

When I load magazines into my pistols, I do not do it gingerly. I do it very stoutly. I don't SLAM them in, but if I got a piece of skin between the floorplate and the magwell, a few layers are probably comming off (not often). It is how I was trained to ensure proper magazine seating, and I believe that the muscle memory helps me in hi-stress situations.

Now the main question. When I load a magazine with the slide in lock-back position on my 19, with the force that I load the weapon, it causes the slide-stop to disengage; chambering a round. No slide release lever, no sling-shoting: Insert-aim-fire. I can and do make this happen reliably with my weapon and have never seen a problem with it. There is no damage to my pistol or the magazines I use because of this, and I can choose whether or not I want the slide to come forward by how hard I insert the mag with the heel of my hand.

Is this technically a malfunction?
And to you Glock owners out there with factory slide-release levers, go ahead and give it a try. If you're inside, you may want to use snap-caps in the magazine.
Can you get it to work?

All things considered, I prefer to have the option of doing it this way. It feels to me like slapping the bolt-release on an AR platform after loading, and I don't have to worry about my fine motor skills durring a stress-reload. Now I don't always do it this way, but I'd say 85-90% of the time I do. My prefered alternative is to insert and slide-release.

Thoughts?
~LT
__________________
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ- Greek:"Come and take them..." Meaning: Here we peaceably stand as armed and free men, willing to defend that peace, and ready to make war upon anyone who threatens that freedom.
LordTio3 is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.06396 seconds with 8 queries