Quote:
|
George Zimmerman should have been found guilty just on the basis that he had a gun AND decided to get into ANY sort of altercation - verbal or not.
|
So you'd favor a law where someone has not objectively done anything more serious than using harsh language, but because they were carrying a gun it's now ... a felony? misdemeanor?
The more disturbing implication is that Zinmerman
"should have been found guilty" ... being that the crime he was charged with was
murder. You state your rationale as
"... the basis that he had a gun AND decided to get into ANY sort of altercation - verbal or not."
Maybe you meant something else?