Quote:
Guys guys guys, leave your prejudices aside here. One must ANTICIPATE the other sides arguments. I am here alleging that a cosmetic AWB would survive strict scrutiny.
But nobody can tell me why I am alleging that? What facts could be used to justify it? Or the IMPACT such a ban would have on your right to self defense?
|
I'm not trying to be rude or argumentative. I feel that Alito's use of the term "fundamental" implies strict scrutiny. In my humble nonlawyer interpretation, strict scrutiny means that absent a clear and compelling case, a right cannot be restricted. For example, the state of Idaho cannot tell me that I cannot own a yellow car unless a very strong case can be made that the color yellow provides a clear and present danger to society, overwhelming my personal right. It's up to the state to prove the case, not me.