Quote:
|
Arguing that a particular firearm is protected under the ADA is like arguing about whether or not a DeWalt power drill is accessible to and usable by the handicapped.
|
Didn't say that. What I said was if the stabilizing brace is effectively "outlawed" it would in effect discriminate against a disabled shooter--for whom it was originally designed. It doesn't discriminate against a tool--it discriminates against the disabled vet's ability to shoot, hunt and or otherwise enjoy the same kinds of activities the rest of us without those injuries can enjoy.