View Single Post
Old March 1, 2013, 11:35 PM   #18
James K
Member In Memoriam
 
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
The gun is obviously a mixmaster; there is no way the receiver could be that bad and the other parts looking like new on an original gun. It is just a matter of trying to figure out how much of the original gun is there and if the damage (deliberate?) to the receiver is bad enough to obscure information. In any case, what might have been an early M1903 has little or no collector value at this point.

Jim
James K is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.02736 seconds with 8 queries