The Firing Line Forums - View Single Post - NJ Carry: Drake v. Filko (Muller v. Maenz)

Daugherty16 · February 27, 2013, 12:15 AM

very interesting arguments. it seemed from start that the panel conceded the right to carry extended in some form outside the home. The posited that concession as an assumption on which to predicate further questions, but i can't think of another reason for the line of questions otherwise. Gura was articulate, passionate and restrained at the same time, and very well versed on his subject. I thought the DAG was going to cry a few times. Probably not her best day in court.

I am thinking this may actually come out in favor of appellants, but expect either way it goes it will be 2-1.

February 27, 2013, 12:15 AM	#73
Daugherty16 Senior Member Join Date: July 10, 2008 Location: Live Free or Die state Posts: 259	Real Courtroom Drama In the Privacy of My Headphones... very interesting arguments. it seemed from start that the panel conceded the right to carry extended in some form outside the home. The posited that concession as an assumption on which to predicate further questions, but i can't think of another reason for the line of questions otherwise. Gura was articulate, passionate and restrained at the same time, and very well versed on his subject. I thought the DAG was going to cry a few times. Probably not her best day in court. I am thinking this may actually come out in favor of appellants, but expect either way it goes it will be 2-1. __________________ "To my mind it is wholly irresponsible to go into the world incapable of preventing violence, injury, crime, and death. How feeble is the mindset to accept defenselessness... How pathetic." - - Ted Nugent "Cogito, Ergo Armitum Sum" - (I Think, Therefore I Am Armed)- - anon. Last edited by Daugherty16; February 27, 2013 at 12:24 AM.